equvis runs eight engines in a single pass for company and subsidiary valuation: from DCF to the credit risk score, from Monte Carlo to the football field. The same input gives the same result — the auditor can re-run the engagement.
Film · 1:18 · silent
From the plant to the financial statements, from eight methods to a defensible range: how equvis builds a valuation.
The project ends, the file closes. The next scenario starts from scratch
No versioning, no assumption log, and the formula error hides inside a cell
The German parent expects IDW, the Turkish team speaks IFRS. Nobody covers the gap
The engagement starts with the information you provide. We agree on what is needed in the first call and fill any missing assumptions together.
Same input, same seed, same result. Assumptions are versioned and the origin of every figure stays on the record throughout the engagement.
You get the value range, the football field and the credit risk score. Changing a scenario takes no new project — you re-run it from the portal.
The company information you share is not exposed to AI models; the calculations run in deterministic engines.
01 / 07The single-number illusion
A single figure hides the answers to eight separate questions.
02 / 07Inputs
Balance sheet, income statement and cash flow sit in one structure. The source of every line is recorded.
03 / 07Eight engines
From DCF to the credit risk score, all of them run in a single pass.
04 / 07Monte Carlo
The distribution looks random. Because the seed is fixed, a rerun tomorrow gives exactly the same result.
05 / 07Traceability
The value links to its assumption, and the assumption to its source and the standard behind it.
06 / 07Football field
DCF, multiples, precedent and NAV meet on one axis. Monte Carlo gives the range its probability weight.
07 / 07Defensible value
A range your auditor can rerun.
The sample case is fictional.
A valuation need arises from the calendar or from an event. The same eight engines run in all four cases below; what changes is which output leads and which standard it rests on.
Buyer and seller put different values on the same company. The negotiation turns on who owns the synergy and on how the control premium and minority discount are separated.
The cash-generating unit's recoverable amount — the higher of value in use and fair value less costs of disposal — is compared with its carrying amount. The auditor's question is not the result but where the discount rate and the growth assumption came from.
In court, in an expert examination or in a tax audit, the argument is less about the result than about how it was produced. Versioned assumptions and an engagement that reproduces identically are decisive here.
Objektivierter Wert and Entscheidungswert are produced in parallel in the same engagement; the difference is reported as the negotiation margin. Detail in the cross-border section below.
Same engines, same portal and API. The only variable is how often you run them
In line with the FAUB approval dated 11.02.2026, objektivierter Wert and plausibilisierter Entscheidungswert are reported in parallel. The DE-Halbeinkünfte beta regime and Tax-CAPM run as standard
Three things set the price: the engine set, the number of scenarios and IDW parallel reporting. All eight engines are included from Silver upwards; Bronze is intended as a single-scenario preliminary valuation.
A cross-section of the output from all eight engines, on a fictional Türkiye case reported in TRY
equvis was built by the corporate finance team at SL Danışmanlık. That team runs and reviews every engagement: the engines handle the computation, while assumption selection and the report itself remain the team's responsibility.
Fill in the form for a demo, an OEM / white-label conversation or DE-TR cross-border questions. We reply within one business day.