equvis runs eight engines in a single pass for company and subsidiary valuation: from DCF to the credit risk score, from Monte Carlo to the football field. The same input gives the same result — the auditor can re-run the engagement.
The project ends, the file closes. The next scenario starts from scratch
No versioning, no assumption log, and the formula error hides inside a cell
The German parent expects IDW, the Turkish team speaks IFRS. Nobody covers the gap
The engagement starts with the information you provide. We agree on what is needed in the first call and fill any missing assumptions together.
Same input, same seed, same result. Assumptions are versioned and the origin of every figure stays on the record throughout the engagement.
You get the value range, the football field and the credit risk score. Changing a scenario takes no new project — you re-run it from the portal.
The company information you share is not exposed to AI models; the calculations run in deterministic engines.
A valuation need arises from the calendar or from an event. The same eight engines run in all four cases below; what changes is which output leads and which standard it rests on.
Buyer and seller put different values on the same company. The negotiation turns on who owns the synergy and on how the control premium and minority discount are separated.
The cash-generating unit's recoverable amount — the higher of value in use and fair value less costs of disposal — is compared with its carrying amount. The auditor's question is not the result but where the discount rate and the growth assumption came from.
In court, in an expert examination or in a tax audit, the argument is less about the result than about how it was produced. Versioned assumptions and an engagement that reproduces identically are decisive here.
Objektivierter Wert and Entscheidungswert are produced in parallel in the same engagement; the difference is reported as the negotiation margin. Detail in the cross-border section below.
Every table and chart in this section shows illustrative data from a fictional case; it is not a real client engagement.
Discounted cash flow on the mid-year convention. Terminal value via Gordon Growth or Exit Multiple, side by side
A business risk × financial risk matrix. From ratios to a score, from the score to a credit spread
10,000+ iterations, P10/P50/P90 and tornado sensitivity. Deterministic seeding: the auditor reruns the identical result
GHG Protocol aligned emission intensity and sector benchmark. The result feeds straight into the discount rate
The industry's signature chart. DCF, multiples, precedent and NAV in one view — a single defensible band
Asset-based net asset value: line-by-line revaluation, hidden reserves and adjustments on the record
Peer company multiples on the Damodaran base, adjusted for country risk premium
Realised transaction multiples with control premium and marketability discount separated out
Same engines, same portal and API. The only variable is how often you run them
In line with the FAUB approval dated 11.02.2026, objektivierter Wert and plausibilisierter Entscheidungswert are reported in parallel. The DE-Halbeinkünfte beta regime and Tax-CAPM run as standard
Three things set the price: the engine set, the number of scenarios and IDW parallel reporting. All eight engines are included from Silver upwards; Bronze is intended as a single-scenario preliminary valuation.
A cross-section of the output from all eight engines, on a fictional Türkiye case reported in TRY
equvis was built by the corporate finance team at SL Danışmanlık. That team runs and reviews every engagement: the engines handle the computation, while assumption selection and the report itself remain the team's responsibility.
Fill in the form for a demo, an OEM / white-label conversation or DE-TR cross-border questions. We reply within one business day.